 |
|
Barbara Hope
Head of Marketing
and Public Affairs at
NML
- NML has gone through
considerable change management over the past few
years with the need to focus more effectively on
lifelong learning initiatives to realise the potential
for building bigger and more diverse audiences
- One of the areas
NML is good at is understanding who visits and
who doesn’t and we have invested
heavily in both qualitative and quantitative market
research
programmes as well front-end, formative and summative
evaluation in the development of new products,
exhibitions and public programmes.etc.
- This has helped
considerably in targeting marketing activity more
effectively
and has led to a very satisfactory
rise in attendance over the last few years.
1.5m visits anticipated this year.
- We know lots about
our general audience but the target group we know
least about is the formal education market.
This is largely due to the fact that education
marketing was not a mainstream activity of the
marketing department
with education marketing undertaken at the
discretion of education officers.
- This fragmentation
and lack of integration with the core marketing/
audience development planning was identified
as a weakness in the recent learning review.
Although there are lots of visits across our eight
venues
by schools/ educational establishments we did
not systematically
collect data on what the groups came for or
the LEA they represented.
- One of the difficulties with a multi site organisation
like NML is that we do not have a centralised booking
system with each venue dealing with its own enquires/bookings.
Consequently if one site is booked there is no
easy way to ‘sell’ a visit elsewhere or
to facilitate a booking without transferring the
caller.
In addition
we have been collecting inconsistent data about
the groups.
- A key task was
to undertake a group booking mapping exercise to
identify
who was visiting for formal learning.
The information would be used to clarify visits
by venue and to identify potential areas to target
marketing
campaigns. The mapping exercise involved cleaning
the data over a three year period so that the
groups fitted
with 14 different DfES group types. This provided
trend data including how many groups visited,
the composition
of the groups and educational categories.
- We found some very useful
trends across National Museums Liverpool - there
has been a steady increase in the
number of primary school visitors but a steady
fall in the number of secondary school visitors.
There has
also been a fall in the number of adult learning
visitors but an increase in the number of further
and higher
education visitors. Across the Merseyside districts
penetration rates for St Helen’s and Knowsley
are exceptionally low.
What does this tell us?
- Valuable information
on where our educational ‘offer’ meets
the needs or not of the different educational target
groups. How to streamline the ‘offer’ so
it is more accessible. We are working in a very
competitive field with every cultural organisation
in competition
for educational visits
- More importantly
the research provides the basis for a carefully
structured
marketing campaign, the success
of which should be measurable against the trends
established by the mapping exercise.
|
| Back
to Conference Summary |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Let us have your thoughts and ideas on conference
and seminar topics which you would find useful. Email
us
|
|
|
|
|
|