|
Sue Wilkinson
Director, Learning,
Access and the Regions
MLA
Phase One Education Programme – Renaissance in
the Regions
• Run September to December
2003
• 36 museums involved
• 936 teachers + 22,000 children
• 3 Questionnaires: teachers, key stage 1 and 2 and key
stage 3 and 4
• Based round GLOs
• Piloted in the summer and changed following piloting
• Focus groups with 68 teachers
Headline Results
28% increase in the number of school
children visiting Phase 1 Hubs
45% of the teachers visiting those Phase One Hubs are
doing so for the first time
73% of the teachers believe that their pupils are learning
new subject specific facts thanks to their museum visit
94% of teachers attending a museum activity see it
directly linking to the National Curriculum.
46% of the visits were made by schools located in wards
which fell into the 20% most deprived wards in England.
• Creativity, inspiration and enjoyment
is the key outcomes for teachers (81%)
• Leads to increase in knowledge and understanding (72%)
• 94% Key Stage 2 children felt they had learnt new things
• 58% Key Stage 3 children think a museum visit makes
school work more inspiring
• Teachers highly satisfied with the provision made especially
for them by museums
• BUT
• Not confident that, at a general level, museums could
provide the facilities and services that their
pupils required.
• Especially the case where pupils had special educational
and physical needs
Renaissance in Regions
• 70 million over 3 years
• 9 Regional museum Hubs
• 9 Strategic cross domain regional agencies
• Museum development fund
• Positive Action traineeships
2 PSA Targets
• Increase number of contacts between children and regional
hub museums by 25% by 2005/6
• Attract additional 500,000 visits to regional museums
by new users predominantly from social classes
C2 D E and ethnic minorities by the end of 2005/6
• 8 Priority areas for action
• Covers care, management and interpretation of collections,
workforce development and standards as well as
access, outreach and learning
• 10 million top sliced for work with schools
• 2.2 million contributed by DfES
EPDPs
• Focus of 2003/4 research
• Establish what teachers and pupils want
• Match this against LEA priorities and wider regional
needs
• Identify what can be delivered through existing funding
• Identify what would need to be in place to deliver
a comprehensive service to schools
Headline Results
• Under representation of KS3 and 4
• Not locked in to curriculum provision properly
• Transport issues
•
Difficulties of visiting – risk assessment
curriculum pressures etc
• Rural issues
• Out of school and family learning and role they have
in delivering attainment
• Significant gaps –
– special schools
– children with disabilities
– gifted and talented
NexSteps
• SR 2004 bid submitted
to Treasury
• Lots of evidence of impact and of need
• Summary of the EPDPs being developed
• Help shape joint DCMS/DfES museum education strategy
• Defines a comprehensive service to schools
• Sets out what needs to be done
|